In this paper, I delineate a variety of questions related to personal identity and ontology. I develop and compare the Confucian conception of the person and the view of the person developed throughout Derek Parfit’s work on personal identity and ontology. I will demonstrate that the Confucian conception of the person has numerous instructive similarities with Parfit’s work on personal identity, despite a number of differences. I argue, briefly, that this project is worthwhile as a piece of comparative philosophy. One of the final two sections of the paper develop a new hybrid account of personal identity and ontology that combine the Confucian and Parfitian views of personal identity and personal ontology. The last section of the paper goes into detail developing this view in response to potential questions, and responds to some objections to this hybrid account, including objections based on a similarity between the Confucian account and the narrative account of personal identity.
"Social Roles and Psychological Continuity: Developing a Confucian-Psychological Continuity Hybrid Account of Personal Identity and Ontology,"
Comparative Philosophy: Vol. 12:
2, Article 4.
Available at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/comparativephilosophy/vol12/iss2/4