Abstract
Roy W. Perrett argues that the Hindu sage, like the western moral saint, seems precluded from pursuing non-moral ends for their own sakes. If he is precluded from pursuing non-moral ends for their own sakes, then he is precluded from pursuing non-moral virtues, interests, activities, relationships, and so on for their own sakes. A life devoid of every such pursuit seems deficient. Hence, the Hindu sage seems to forsake the good life. In response, I adapt a reply that Vanessa Carbonell offers in the context of the moral saint. The Hindu sage might pursue non-moral virtues, interests, activities, relationships, and so on for their own sakes, so long as his motivation to pursue moksa is read de re rather than de dicto. Indeed, this reply is more convincing in the case of the Hindu sage than it is in the case of the moral saint.
Recommended Citation
FRAMARIN, CHRISTOPHER G.
(2016)
"MORAL SAINTS, HINDU SAGES, AND THE GOOD LIFE,"
Comparative Philosophy: Vol. 7:
Iss.
1, Article 5.
Available at:
https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/comparativephilosophy/vol7/iss1/5
Included in
Comparative Philosophy Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Other Philosophy Commons
