Early Pyrrhonism as a Sect of Buddhism? A Case Study in the Methodology of Comparative Philosophy
We offer a sceptical examination of a thesis recently advanced in a monograph published by Princeton University Press, entitled Greek Buddha: Pyrrho’s Encounter with Early Buddhism in Central Asia. In this dense and probing work, Christopher I. Beckwith, a professor of Central Eurasian studies at Indiana University, Bloomington, argues that Pyrrho of Elis adopted a form of early Buddhism during his years in Bactria and Gandhāra, and that early Pyrrhonism must be understood as a sect of early Buddhism. In making his case Beckwith claims that virtually all scholars of Greek, Indian, and Chinese philosophy have been operating under flawed assumptions and with flawed methodologies, and so have failed to notice obvious and undeniable correspondences between the philosophical views of the Buddha and of Pyrrho. In this study we take Beckwith’s proposal and challenge seriously, and we examine his textual basis and techniques of translation, his methods of examining passages, his construal of problems and his reconstruction of arguments. We find that his presuppositions are contentious and doubtful, his own methods are extremely flawed, and that he draws unreasonable conclusions. Although the result of our study is almost entirely negative, we think it illustrates some important general points about the methodology of comparative philosophy.
JOHNSON, Monte Ransome and SHULTS, Brett
"Early Pyrrhonism as a Sect of Buddhism? A Case Study in the Methodology of Comparative Philosophy,"
Comparative Philosophy: Vol. 9:
2, Article 4.
Available at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/comparativephilosophy/vol9/iss2/4
Classical Literature and Philology Commons, Comparative Philosophy Commons, History of Philosophy Commons