Abstract
Nāgārjuna’s doctrine of emptiness, his ideas on “two truths” and language, and his general method of arguing are presented clearly by him and can be stated without paradox. That the dialetheists today can restate his beliefs in paradoxical ways does not mean that Nāgārjuna argued that way; in fact, their restatements misrepresent and undercut his arguments.
Recommended Citation
JONES, Richard H.
(2018)
"Dialetheism, Paradox, and Nāgārjuna’s Way of Thinking,"
Comparative Philosophy: Vol. 9:
Iss.
2, Article 5.
Available at:
https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/comparativephilosophy/vol9/iss2/5
Included in
Comparative Philosophy Commons, History of Philosophy Commons, Logic and Foundations of Mathematics Commons, Metaphysics Commons, Other Philosophy Commons
