Publication Date
Spring 2026
Degree Type
Master's Project
Degree Name
Master of Science in Computer Science (MSCS)
Department
Computer Science
First Advisor
Navrati Saxena
Second Advisor
Genya Ishigaki
Third Advisor
Kalindi Parekh
Keywords
clinical reasoning, large language models, retrieval augmented generation, multi-agent systems, hallucination reduction
Abstract
Recent advances in large language models have enabled strong performance on medical QA benchmarks, yet their clinical reliability remains limited due to unsup- ported reasoning, incomplete differential diagnoses, and single pass inference. We propose a retrieval augmented multi agent framework that improves reasoning through three stages: evidence conditioned hypothesis generation, adversarial critique to chal- lenge hypotheses, and independent verification. Each component is grounded using semantic retrieval from PubMed, MedQA explanations, and MIMIC III records. The system is evaluated on MedQA USMLE and MIMIC derived prompts against both a general purpose LLM and a fine tuned medical model. Results show improved supported sentence rate, attribution precision and recall, and overall evidence ground- edness, alongside reductions in unsupported claims, hallucinations, Brier score, and expected calibration error, while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. This demonstrates that adversarial and verification based inference enhances evidence alignment and uncertainty calibration without requiring additional supervised training.
Recommended Citation
Bhoyar, Shreyas, "When Agents Disagree: A Multi-Agent Debate Approach to Clinical Reasoning" (2026). Master's Projects. 1790.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.g5q3-42wg
https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_projects/1790