Critical race studies in qualitative research: a review and future directions
Publication Date
1-1-2023
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education
Volume
36
Issue
1
DOI
10.1080/09518398.2022.2110961
First Page
1
Last Page
8
Abstract
In 2021, former President Donald Trump issued a presidential memo halting and prohibiting “divisive” and “anti-American propaganda” in federal contracting--described as “any training on ‘critical race theory,’ ‘white privilege,’ or any other training and propaganda effort that teaches or suggests either (1) that the United States is an inherently racist or evil country or (2) that any race or ethnicity is inherently racist or evil”. Unsurprisingly, the concerted attack against CRT grossly misunderstands what CRT is and often equates teaching about individual racism, privilege, unconscious bias, systemic racism, and U.S. history with the teaching of CRT. As of October 2021, 28 states have restricted education on racism, bias, and the teaching of CRT.
Keywords
anti-CRT, Critical race theory, higher education, qualitative methods
Department
Educational Leadership
Recommended Citation
María C. Ledesma, Vanessa Johnson Ojeda, Shawn R. Coon, and Laurence Parker. "Critical race studies in qualitative research: a review and future directions" International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education (2023): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2022.2110961