Scientific argumentation and responsive teaching: Using dialog to teach science in three middle-school classrooms
Publication Date
11-1-2022
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Science Education
Volume
106
Issue
6
DOI
10.1002/sce.21740
First Page
1354
Last Page
1374
Abstract
Despite broad consensus on the value of classroom dialog for promoting scientific argumentation, tensions have emerged in the literature regarding the degree to which teachers should guide the dialogic process (dialogic stance). We use the lens of responsive teaching to examine how one teacher adjusts his instruction to foster dialog in three middle-school science classrooms. Applying grounded theory to classroom dialogs and teacher interview data, we examine the dynamic interplay of the teacher's overarching goal and moment-to-moment pedagogical aims to understand shifts in his dialogic stance. Our findings illustrate the value of foregrounding responsiveness to students' disciplinary thinking when offering guidance to teachers about when and how to support students in peer-based argumentative dialog.
Funding Number
CA
Funding Sponsor
Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research
Keywords
dialogic teaching, responsive teaching, scientific argumentation
Department
Teacher Education
Recommended Citation
Mark Felton, Daniel M. Levin, Susan De La Paz, and Cameron Butler. "Scientific argumentation and responsive teaching: Using dialog to teach science in three middle-school classrooms" Science Education (2022): 1354-1374. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21740