Actor-Networks in Political Moral Conflict: A Case Study of an Online Gun Control Debate
Publication Date
1-1-2024
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
American Behavioral Scientist
DOI
10.1177/00027642241240333
Abstract
This research case study employs a theoretical and methodological framework of moral conflict theory informed by actor-network theory to better understand the sociomaterial entanglements—networks of human and non-human actors—that constitute political moral conflict. We analyze a case of moral conflict surrounding the issue of gun control, found within an online debate forum that was initiated by the question: should guns be banned in America? Through this case analysis, we identify key convergences and divergences in communication that facilitate coordination and cause incommensurability in conflict. These results reveal a new possibility for transcending political polarization through dialogue that attempts to account for the moral demands of objects.
Keywords
actor-network theory, guns, moral conflict theory, political communication, social media
Department
Communication Studies
Recommended Citation
Kristen L. Cole, Marie C. Haverfield, and Spencer Daniel Choate. "Actor-Networks in Political Moral Conflict: A Case Study of an Online Gun Control Debate" American Behavioral Scientist (2024). https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642241240333