Do goals of care documentation reflect the conversation?: Evaluating conversation-documentation accuracy
Publication Date
8-1-2024
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume
72
Issue
8
DOI
10.1111/jgs.18913
First Page
2500
Last Page
2507
Abstract
Background: Documenting goals of care in the electronic health record is meant to relay patient preferences to other clinicians. Evaluating the content and documentation of nurse and social worker led goals of care conversations can inform future goals of care initiative efforts. Methods: As part of the ADvancing symptom Alleviation with Palliative Treatment trial, this study analyzed goals of care conversations led by nurses and social workers and documented in the electronic health record. Informed by a goals of care communication guide, we identified five goals of care components: illness understanding, goals and values, end of life planning, surrogate, and advance directives. Forty conversation transcripts underwent content analysis. Through an iterative team process, we defined documentation accuracy as four categories: (1) Complete—comprehensive accurate documentation of the conversation, (2) Incomplete—partial documentation of the conversation, (3) Missing—discussed and not documented, and (4) Incorrect—misrepresented in documentation. We also defined—Not Discussed—for communication guide questions that were not discussed nor documented. A constant comparative approach was used to determine the presence or absence of conversation content in the documentation. Results: All five goals of care components were discussed in 67% (27/40) of conversation transcripts. Compared to the transcripts, surrogate (37/40, 93%) and advance directives (36/40, 90%) were often documented completely. Almost 40% of goals and values (15/40, 38%) and half of end of life planning (19/40, 48%) were incomplete. Illness understanding was missing (13/40, 33%), not discussed (13/40, 33%), or incorrect (2/40, 5%). Conclusion: Nurse and social worker led goals of care conversations discussed and documented most components of the goals of care communication guide. Further research may guide how best to determine the relative importance of accuracy, especially in the broad setting of incomplete, missing, and incorrect EHR documentation.
Funding Number
HEAL K12NS130673
Funding Sponsor
University of Michigan
Keywords
advance care planning, documentation, goals of care
Department
Communication Studies
Recommended Citation
Jessica E. Ma, Lindsay Schlichte, Marie Haverfield, Julia Gambino, Allison Lange, Kelly Blanchard, Brianne Morgan, and David B. Bekelman. "Do goals of care documentation reflect the conversation?: Evaluating conversation-documentation accuracy" Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (2024): 2500-2507. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.18913