Publication Date
8-1-2024
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Philosophies
Volume
9
Issue
4
DOI
10.3390/philosophies9040110
Abstract
Recent discussions of logical pluralism trace its origins to Rudolf Carnap’s principle of tolerance; indeed, the principle is seen as one of Carnap’s lasting philosophical contributions. In this paper, I will argue that Carnap’s reasons for adopting this principle are not purely logical, but are rather founded in the Vienna Circle’s manifesto—a programmatic document that brings the Circle’s philosophical work together with a program of social change. Building on work by Uebel, Romizi, and others, I argue that we must understand the principle in light of Carnap’s role in writing the manifesto, and thus as integrated into the larger philosophical and political goals of the Circle. This history illuminates the often-ignored relationship between Carnap’s logical pluralism and his political views. Finally, I turn to the political situation of the post-World War 2 period in the United States. During this time, the Circle’s emigres in the USA transitioned their work from active efforts to reform society to the technical work that we recognize as the foundation of American analytic philosophy today. In this final section, I argue that the reasons that Carnap distanced himself from the political foundations of his view were due in large part to McCarthy-era persecution of left-wing academics.
Keywords
history of analytic philosophy, logical pluralism, philosophy of logic, Rudolf Carnap
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Department
Philosophy
Recommended Citation
Noah Friedman-Biglin. "Regrounding the Unworldly: Carnap’s Politically Engaged Logical Pluralism" Philosophies (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9040110