Comparison between Ribosomal Assembly and Machine Learning Tools for Microbial Identification of Organisms with Different Characteristics

Publication Date

1-1-2025

Document Type

Article

Publication Title

Current Bioinformatics

Volume

20

Issue

7

DOI

10.2174/0115748936299440240709070105

First Page

595

Last Page

619

Abstract

Background: Genome assembly tools are used to reconstruct genomic sequences from raw sequencing data, which are then used for identifying the organisms present in a metagenomic sample. Methodology: More recently, machine learning approaches have been applied to a variety of bioinformatics problems, and in this paper, we explore their use for organism identification. We start by evaluating several commonly used metagenomic assembly tools, including PhyloFlash, MEGAHIT, MetaSPAdes, Kraken2, Mothur, UniCycler, and PathRacer, and compare them against state-of-the-art deep learning-based machine learning classification approaches represented by DNABERT and DeLUCS, in the context of two synthetic mock community datasets. Results: Our analysis focuses on determining whether ensembling metagenome assembly tools with machine learning tools have the potential to improve identification performance relative to using the tools individually. Conclusion: We find that this is indeed the case, and analyze the level of effectiveness of potential tool ensembling for organisms with different characteristics (based on factors such as repetitiveness, genome size, and GC content).

Funding Number

DE-AC02-05CH11231

Funding Sponsor

San José State University

Keywords

kraken2, MEGAHIT, metaSPAdes, mothur, pathRacer, PhyloFlash, uniCycler

Department

Computer Engineering

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS