Publication Date
12-29-2025
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Fire
Volume
9
Issue
1
DOI
10.3390/fire9010019
Abstract
Accurate vertical distribution of fire-induced heat fluxes in the atmosphere is critical for realistic coupled fire–atmosphere simulations. In response to concerns raised by Shamsaei et al. (2023) regarding potential energy conservation issues in the WRF-SFIRE heat distribution scheme, this study first conducts a comprehensive theoretical analysis, demonstrating that the original exponential formulation exhibits negligible error under typical domain configurations. Then, it introduces a novel formulation, called the Versatile Energy-Conservative Distribution scheme, that rigorously guarantees energy conservation while providing enhanced flexibility in specifying vertical distribution profiles. The proposed method accommodates multiple profiles, including exponential, Gaussian, and gamma, and enables the independent treatment of surface and canopy heat fluxes, thereby yielding a more flexible representation of fire heat fluxes. Numerical evaluations on both fine and coarse non-uniform meshes confirm that the new formulation maintains perfect energy balance across various configurations and overcomes the limitations observed in other schemes, such as the truncated Gaussian approach. These advancements not only refute previous claims of significant energy misrepresentation but also offer a robust and flexible framework intended to improve the representation of fire–atmosphere interactions in numerical models.
Funding Number
80 NSSC23K1344
Funding Sponsor
National Center for Atmospheric Research
Keywords
coupled atmosphere-fire model, fire model, heat fluxes
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Department
Meteorology and Climate Science
Recommended Citation
Aurélien Costes and Adam K. Kochanski. "Comment on Shamsaei et al. The Role of Fuel Characteristics and Heat Release Formulations in Coupled Fire-Atmosphere Simulation. Fire 2023, 6, 264" Fire (2025). https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9010019
Comments
This article is a commentary on a previously published article in the journal, Fire 2023, 6(7), 264, https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6070264