Making the Case for Community-Responsive Circularity: Lessons From a Legacy Textile Manufacturing Region
Publication Date
3-18-2026
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Urban Studies
DOI
10.1177/00420980261423013
Abstract
Circularity means extending the life of resources that would otherwise end up in a landfill. But recirculation is not limited to material resources. Social networks, community assets, and industrial traditions can also be repurposed, raising the question: how can innovations in material circularity be attentive to social inclusion and outcomes? We address this through the case of Material Return, a textile initiative in Western North Carolina that transforms textile waste into high-quality fiber and yarn while supporting smaller firms, stabilizing jobs, and elevating worker voice. By highlighting the enabling institutional arrangements and practices that allow Material Return to combine material and societal circularity, this case offers lessons for other cities and regions seeking to align environmental sustainability with social equity.
Keywords
circularity, community wealth generation, community-responsive circularity, North Carolina, textiles
Department
Urban and Regional Planning
Recommended Citation
Nichola Lowe, Sophie Kelmenson, Molly Hemstreet, and Bob Carswell. "Making the Case for Community-Responsive Circularity: Lessons From a Legacy Textile Manufacturing Region" Urban Studies (2026). https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980261423013