Publication Date
7-19-2026
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Iise Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors
DOI
10.1080/24725838.2026.2690414
Abstract
Occupational Applications: This study shows that time-critical automation intervention requests increase drivers’ visual-motor demands, reflected in measurable changes in driving performance and posture (i.e., limb engagement and trunk positioning) during transitions of control. These responses indicate that maneuver urgency and takeover timing can place elevated biomechanical and coordination demands on drivers, particularly in work-based automated driving. For ergonomics and human factors practice, the findings underscore the need to design automated transportation systems (e.g., ridesharing services) that align request timing with operators’ physical and perceptual capabilities. In occupational settings such as automated shuttles and fleet-supervised vehicles, intervention requests should provide adequate preparation time for visual-motor coordination, limit concurrent steering and braking actions, and support stable trunk and lower-limb postures during control transitions. System designers and fleet operators should treat automated driving as a work system, integrating interface timing, alerts, and control transitions to support safe and sustainable on-the-road performance.
Keywords
automated driving, driving posture, motor demand, temporal urgency, Visual-motor coordination
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Department
Industrial and Systems Engineering
Recommended Citation
Kailin Cui, Jonathan Chiu, Pranav Meda, Gaojian Huang, and Yue Luo. "Visual-Motor Coordination in Automated Driving: Effects of Temporal Urgency and Motor Demand on Intervention Behavior" Iise Transactions on Occupational Ergonomics and Human Factors (2026). https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2026.2690414