Publication Date
2-24-2021
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
English in Education
Volume
56
Issue
1
DOI
10.1080/04250494.2021.1888643
First Page
92
Last Page
103
Abstract
We have become well-familiar with how unpoetic teaching can be. The prevalence, furthered by much recent reform, of a systematic school culture focused on accountability, standardisation, and learnification often renders teaching dehumanised work. This paper theorises a poetics of teaching. We begin considering poetics, focusing on figurative language as a concept at the core of the art. Figurative language offers a model for figurative education, in which teachers treat their practice as metaphors treat language, a move that opens education towards complexity and ambiguity. Further, we consider what makes poetry matter to people: resonance, or the relational aspects of writing. We explore resonance in conversation with philosophies of relationality, theorising how poetic teaching necessitates an engagement with the relational. We find what may be required to teach poetically is risk-taking, risks all the more beautiful for the ways they engage teachers and students as complex persons doing meaningful work.
Keywords
Poetics, teaching, resonance, figurative language, relationality
Department
English and Comparative Literature
Recommended Citation
Alecia Beymer and Scott Jarvie. "I never quite got it, what they meant: an introduction to poetic teaching" English in Education (2021): 92-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2021.1888643
Comments
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in English in Education on February 24, 2021, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2021.1888643.