Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2017
Publication Title
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Volume
12
Issue Number
1
First Page
2
Last Page
17
DOI
10.18438/B84C96
Keywords
games, gaming, collection management, play
Disciplines
Collection Development and Management | Library and Information Science
Abstract
Objective – The purpose of this study is to explore collection development, cataloguing, processing, and circulation practices for tabletop game collections in libraries. This study used the term “tabletop games” to refer to the array of game styles that are played in real-world, social settings, such as board games, dice and card games, collectible card games, and role-playing games. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 2017, 12.1 3 Methods – An online survey regarding tabletop games in libraries was developed with input from academic, public, and school librarians. Participants were recruited utilizing a snowball sampling technique involving electronic outlets and discussion lists used by librarians in school, public, and academic libraries. Results – One hundred nineteen libraries answered the survey. The results show that tabletop games have a presence in libraries, but practices vary in regard to collection development, cataloguing, processing, and circulation. Conclusion – Results indicate that libraries are somewhat fragmented in their procedures for tabletop collections. Libraries can benefit from better understanding how others acquire, process, and use these collections. Although they are different to other library collections, tabletop games do not suffer from extensive loss and bibliographic records are becoming more available. Best practices and guidance are still needed to fully integrate games into libraries and to help librarians feel comfortable piloting their own tabletop collections.
Recommended Citation
Teresa Slobuski, Diane Robson, and PJ Bentley. "Arranging the Pieces: A Survey of Library Practices Related to a Tabletop Game Collection" Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (2017): 2-17. https://doi.org/10.18438/B84C96
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.
Comments
This article was originally published in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, volume 12, issue 1, 2017. It can also be found online at this link. CC 2017 Slobuski, Robson, and Bentley. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons‐Attribution‐Noncommercial‐Share Alike License 4.0 International (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, not used for commercial purposes, and, if transformed, the resulting work is redistributed under the same or similar license to this one.