•  
  •  
 

Abstract

The methods police officers use to detain resisting subjects have changed over time. One addition to their methods is the Thomas A. Swift Electric Rifle (TASER), which hinders subjects using electric shock. This paper examines the effectiveness of the TASER, the potential risk of injury for suspects, and scenarios where its use is most likely to succeed. Since its adoption, the TASER has reduced the likelihood of injury to officers and suspects and is more effective against heavy-set and intoxicated individuals. Although extremely unlikely to result in death, injuries are more likely when used against mentally disturbed people and in situations when falling presents a physical danger. When compared to other methods like pepper spray or physical force, the TASER is least likely to cause injury and most effective at subduing resisting subjects. Officers should be able to understand when using a TASER is necessary. Department policies and training standards should reflect this principle, which will increase successful deployments and further reduce injuries.

Share

COinS