•  
  •  
 

Abstract

This article critically evaluates the arguments for and against the continuing use of police dogs. Arguments against the continuing usage of police dogs include the high level of variability in success rates due to different traits of the dogs, differing training styles, and the various types of drugs that the dogs are trained to detect. Arguments against the continuance of police dogs also include the legal issues related to the use of police dogs; health implications, job-related injuries incurred by the dogs, and the expenses related to the purchasing, training, and care of the working dogs. The arguments in favor of the continued use of police dogs highlight how the dogs can be trained to complete a variety of tasks and how having a canine unit can help build positive relationships between police departments and the communities they serve. Research articles, case studies, news articles, surveys, and other forms of literature are consulted to gather information about both sides of the argument. While there has been research conducted on the topic, there is not enough to make a definitive conclusion regarding the continuation of the usage of police dogs. More research needs to be conducted to further the investigation into the benefits and issues regarding the use of police dogs.

Download

Share

COinS